When assessing an act of violence, we tend to be less severe on violence

When assessing an act of violence, we tend to be less severe on violence

When assessing an act of violence, we tend to be less severe on violence committed in the heat of the moment than on premeditated violence, which we judge to be far more cruel. Yet, when we punish hot-blooded violence with the violence of, say, long-term imprisonment, we do so with premeditation. Are we therefore more cruel as judges than the criminals we condemn?

Read another response by Charles Taliaferro
Read another response about Ethics